Prof. Siri Gamage

Adjunct Associate Professor of the School of Social Science and Psychology, Western Sydney University
Title: Knowledge Construction through Education and research: Decolonial Perspective for the Global South
Abstract:
During the British Empire, Eurocentric knowledge, epistemology and research methodologies were introduced to higher education institutions in the former colonies like Ceylon through various disciplines in natural and social sciences as well as the humanities. The medium of instruction was English and in most instances the professors also came from Western backgrounds. Local academics had to obtain Western qualifications to be able to join the teaching and research process.
Text books and journals that were recommended had their origins in European or later American contexts. Knowledge paradigms and research methodologies were developed in the West and transmitted to learners in higher education institutions in the colonies. This shift in the way knowledge was constructed and transmitted had far reaching consequences on the academia to the extent that some have identified a) academic dependency on Western European and American knowledge b) marginalisation and even erasure of local/indigenous epistemologies and knowledge construction methods. Globally, an unequal knowledge order has emerged.
Those working in metropolitan centres(capitals of former empires) have access to better resources, journals, funding, and institutional prestige. Those working in the former colonies, apart from possessing a dependent mentality and orientation, suffer from the lack of such working conditions. In this keynote speech, I will expand on this phenomenon with a focus on social sciences and humanities while providing some ideas about the path forward in order to provide an education and research orientation that can liberate the academics and students from academic dependency and captive mind set.
Prof. James J. Cochran

Department of Information Systems, Statistics, and Management Science
Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration
University of Alabama
Title: The Difficulties of Data Collection under Extreme Conditions
Abstract:
Statistics Without Borders (http://community.amstat.org/statisticswithoutborders/home) is an Outreach Group of the American Statistical Association that is comprised entirely of volunteers. SWB provides free statistical consulting to organizations and government agencies, particularly from developing nations, which do not have the resources for statistical services. In support of non-partisan and secular activities, SWB promotes the use of statistics to improve the health and well-being of all people.
Working in support of SWB’s mission often necessitates collection of data under alarmingly difficult conditions – war, famine, terrorism, disease, destruction, corporate corruption, despots – conditions that a formal education in statistics generally does not equip one to handle. How does a statistician anticipate and contend with these conditions? What are the potential ramifications for the project, the statistician, and the data collectors? In this talk I will discuss difficult conditions that arose as I worked on SWB projects in the Republic of the Congo, Haiti, and Somalia. I will also explain ways that my colleagues and I were able to (in widely varying degrees) work around these difficulties to collect reasonably reliable and meaningful data, and I will emphasize the importance of partnering with colleagues who are familiar with the region in which the data are to be collected. I will also explain how members of the audience can get involved in SWB.
Dr. Bimali Indrarathne

Department of Education, University of York,
United Kingdom
Title: Underrepresentation of non-WEIRD communities in language science research and making research findings widely accessible
Abstract:
Whether humanity is fairly represented in research is a growing concern in many fields. For example, Henrich, Heine and Norenzayan’s (2010) review on publications in behavioural science highlights that the vast majority of samples in research comes from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) populations. Several reviews of research in language science also show a similar picture (e.g., Plonsky, 2016; Andringa & Godfroid, 2020). This questions how far the existing research findings can be generalized to the large language learning-teaching communities from non-WEIRD backgrounds. In addition to sampling biases, there are other issues such as heavy domination of Western scholarship in the field and underrepresentation of non-native speaker authors. Another issue in this field is that the research findings are not easily accessible to practitioners because publications are not freely available to a wider population and the highly technical and specialised language in them may be unintelligible to people outside the research community (Marsden, Trofimovich & Ellis, 2019).
Open Science practices have given rise to several initiatives in order to address such issues. This includes open access journal articles, making research data and instruments available (e.g., IRIS project) and making research finding widely and openly accessible to practitioners (e.g., OASIS project). SLA for All? initiative (Andringa & Godfroid, 2018) has attempted to address the sampling issue by inviting replications of second language acquisition studies in non-WEIRD contexts.
In this talk, I will discuss these key issues in detail and highlight the implications of some open science practices drawing examples from my own research in non-WEIRD contexts.
Prof. Jeanne Marecek

Senior Research Professor and Wm. Kenan Professor Emerita
Swarthmore College
USA
Title: A Short History of the Future: Sri Lankan Psychology Comes of Age
Abstract:
Psychology was latecomer to the academic scene in Sri Lanka. It entered university settings in the late 1980’s, as the stepchild of other disciplines—philosophy, psychiatry, and sociology. In the following 30 years, Sri Lankan psychologists have worked hard to establish a home of their own and to solidify the identity of the field. I briefly trace the accomplishments of these psychologists. Then I turn attention to the present. Today, psychology in Sri Lanka is growing rapidly, albeit unevenly. The time is ripe for disciplinary reflexivity—a scrutiny of the possibilities and pitfalls of psychology as it developed in North America and Europe. What lessons are there for future developments in psychology in Sri Lanka?
Psychologists in Western countries have begun to call into question presumptions that have long been taken for granted. For example, since its beginning 150 years ago, the field has tried to model itself on natural sciences like physics. But, as critics point out, persons are not like atoms or chemical elements. They do not behave in accord with general laws. Instead, their actions are guided by their intentions, aspirations, moral visions, relations with others, ethical commitments, and so on. These are shaped in turn by their cultural and societal surround. Other critics have pointed out ways in which psychology has played handmaiden to social values. Too often, psychological knowledge has been laced with racist, sexist, and colonialist assertions. Yet other critics have taken issue with the “quantitative imperative” that promoted to a blind trust in numerical scales and tests based on populations in Western high-income countries.
Academic psychologists who seek knowledge about Sri Lankan persons must endeavor to decolonize psychology. A decolonized psychology ought to center on Sri Lanka, attending to the norms and rules of its local cultures and to local lifeways, worldviews, moral visions, and practices. Such a decolonial gaze will offer a counterpoint to some assumptions of conventional Western-centric psychologies. A good example is individualism, an assumption that sees the attainment of individuation and separation as the goal of children’s development and that extols people who “march to the beat of their own drum”, defying social rules. Individualism underlies much of Western-centric psychology, such as theories of the self; prescriptions for childrearing; and definitions of mental health. Further, decolonizing clinical and counseling psychology requires that psychologists learn about local idioms of distress—the patterned ways that psychological suffering manifests itself. They also can gain knowledge of the socially sanctioned “sick role” in Sri Lanka and the local practices of alleviating psychological suffering.